
RRX Body Politic
A general theory of the body politic, it seems, should likely
be of intrinsic applicability to an arbitrary synthetic
frame of reference (sfr) . One might conjecture that all possible synthetic
frames of reference of the universe might be the natural de facto superset,
of such a theory. Notably the implied synthetic frame of reference may
not apply directly to a "particular body politic" subset element,
of the superset, as it is "derived in general" from "abstract
assumptions". The "design" of the synthetic frame of reference
is based in part on the assumption of a body politic "ad indefinitum"
through the use of "generalized context representational spaces".
The derived implications of the synthetic frame of reference are then considered
in relation to the particular eccentricities of a hypothetical, or de facto
body politic. This preliminary exercise may be useful in highlighting and
mitigating potential "downstream" conflict, and also in consideration
of long term scalability.
Preliminary considerations:
 the intrinsic context of existence
An arbitrary synthetic frame of reference from the
inferred presence of apparently observable intrinsic change, of an
artifact representation, such as this context, might postulate or experience
the possible existence of "events", which are distinguished
by a "difference". The context of difference events, it seems,
may imply the concepts of relative position/location/sequence, in a
range of possibilities. In summary from the implied context difference
change all the possible commonalties of a contextual environment of
"existence", or an arbitrary synthetic frame of reference,
of the context seem apparently for lack of other fundamental preceding
possibilities to inevitably converge on the abstractions of "relative
position/location/sequence", and the derivatives thereof. The
generalized abstraction, by induction of the relative position/location/sequence
concept although "derived" from the possibility of experience
(events) is apparently not limited to application in that realm alone.
In like manner an arbitrary synthetic frame of reference
might similarly imply the concept of a local context "intrinsic
representation space", although the specific detectable manifestation
of such is only apparently by particular difference change, for a
particular subset of context events.
 intrinsic representation space
An arbitrary synthetic frame of references' context
intrinsic events (experience) might be related by the means of noninstantaneous
(persistent) representation "generation effect(s)". This
implies the possibilities in this regard as possible "built
in operators", of a context intrinsic representation space.
 built in operators
The implied "difference operator"
is, it seems, possibly the most fundamental implying a "built
in" context intrinsic representation space event transformation
to perform "of its own accord" specific types of
"comparison operation" on "representations".
Clearly the "difference operator" sequence might
form an output "resultant synthetic representation"
and consequently implies the covariant "basis of existence",
or "detectability of change", for an arbitrary synthetic
frame of reference. Evaluation of the possibilities is seemingly
the prerequisite for the synthesis of commonalty, or contradiction,
leading to the implication of system wide patterns, or lack
of them, which are independent of the apparent arbitrary
specificities of any possible observer whatsoever. As such
one might consider that the systematic application of the
"difference operator" implies the possible existence
of apparently, potentially common arbitrary synthetic frame
of reference wide, intrinsic types of synthetic representation.
 types of synthetic representation
The repeated displacement of an assumed
singularity by "difference of position/location/sequence"
from another, by difference in a range of possibilities,
seemingly implies via the "difference operator"
the possible existence of both "different singularities"
and "gap differences" between singularities,
which are separate though clearly related synthetic representations.
Similarly these synthetic derivatives form
a "difference of type" of derived representation.
One might consider that the possibility of difference
of the singularities may be implicit, only in their relation
of position/location/sequence to the others, by the gap
differences, such that the difference of type is merely
of perspective. However clearly the view of the possibilities
of specific and unique singularities, separated by arbitrary
gaps, or specific and unique gaps terminated by arbitrary
singularities are different derived synthetic representation
types, based on a difference of perspective of the singularity/gap
system. The consideration of either both specific
and unique singularities and gaps or completely arbitrary
singularities and gaps is apparently different again,
simply by applying or relieving "constraints of detail"
from the model. Thus the specific abstraction of a singularity
representation in position/location by consideration
of difference, in a range of possibilities, it seems leads
inevitably to the concepts of "idealized geometric
forms". Similarly the arbitrary abstraction of a
singularity representation in position/location by consideration
of difference, in a range of possibilities, it seems leads
inevitably to the concepts of "idealized distribution
systems".
These preliminary considerations it seems imply a possibly inevitable
general common logic of synthetic representation(s), for all arbitrary
synthetic frames of reference.
