Xnet SJF Report 2005 - Booth Setup 919B & 2158
SC05 Xnet Super Jumbo Frames (SJF) Links
Bill Rutherford, Lixin Liu, Randy Ottman, Martin Siegert, Arnold Sodder and
Brian Corrie arrived around noon or so on Sunday. All exhibitor badges were
arranged efficiently in short order. Both router were shipped to the correct
booths. The BigBangwidth optical switch was shipped to 2158. One of the first
factors noted was the yellow SMF spools for all the dark fibre connections.
Apparently this was not noted until the last minute giving us little time
to adapt. The routed connection was of orange MMF cable allowing direct connection
to a server for testing. The routed connection was working in short order.
In response to the SMF dark fibre a somewhat hasty note sent to Loki Jorgenson
by Bill Rutherford resulting in three 10G LR NICs with SC connectors appearing
on Monday night. The X8 router was set up by Randy and Arnold in 2158 by Sunday
evening proceeding smoothly despite the absence of racks. The 2158 power connections
for the router were of correct disposition and location. Two AX/4000 XLP and
two server blades were unloaded and carried by hand to 2158 from Martin's
vehicle. Apparently some GBICs/SFPs which might have been used for SMF were
not allowed entry from Canada with Brian Corrie who came in a separate vehicle.
The ER16 router was setup Monday morning, resting on the floor in 919B as
no plaform of sufficient substance could be located to mount it's considerable
mass. The 919B power connections for the router were of correct disposition
and location. Loki Jorgenson arrived Monday morning (wearing a kilt). Gary
Finley arrived Monday noon. A Freeman order was placed on Monday by Paul Daspit
for swap of 2 x 6 table in 919B for 2 x 3 table, due to space limitations.
Also an order was placed by Paul Love for a blue cloth for the X8 pedestal
in 2158. The AX/4000 XLP 1G cards were moved to a single chassis and located
in 919B with a successful test run on the ER16 at 64000 bytes after config
by Arnold. The AX/4000 control software was copied to Loki's notebook and
the automated powerpoint finalized. The Xnet sign for 919B was mounted with
velcro tape in the same locale as the 919A signage. This completed the main
exhibit for 919B. The lightpath connection to Nortel/540 was routed through
the X8 using an LX SFP with a LC-SC jumper adapter, of which 3 were kindly
loaned us by SCInet. Considerable troubleshooting of the fibre connection
by Nortel, Thomas Tam, Arnold Sodder Lixin Liu and Martin Siegert finally
saw it working by Tuesday afternoon via the X8, with successful demos thereafter.
All parties are to be congratulated on the difficult task of getting the lightpath
to work properly in such a short time frame. The server blade for 919B was
opened and the 1G NIC swapped out for the 10G NIC. The SMF dark fibre SC connectors
were connected to the NIC using the DFB pair corresponding to DFB in 2158.
The server blade for 2158 was opened and the 1G NIC swapped out for the 10G
NIC. The SMF dark fibre SC connectors were connected to the NIC using the
DFB pair corresponding to DFB in 919B. It was noted that the link light came
on and assumed a valid circuit was present. Subsequent efforts revealed the
link not to be working over the DFB link or the DFC link and both servers
were moved to 2158 where they were connected via short SC-SMF-SC jumpers.
Investigation revealed a working link via jumper but not over the DFB/DFC
links. A trouble ticket was issued to investigate on Tuesday. A SCInet team
was on site shortly after the ticket was issued and efficiently investigated
the DFB and DFC links. The losses measured were apparently in the 4 db range
due to numerous intermediate connectors, however more than adequate for the
link. The DFB and DFC were connected in 919B providing a loopback to both
machines in 2158. Subsequent investigations seemed to verify the 10G NICs
could communicate over a short jumper but not over the longer loopback link
for some reason. The empty AX/4000 chassis in 2158 was swapped out by Greg
Goddard for a chassis with two 10G Generator/Analyzer pairs. The model of
these was of WAN only type thus prohibiting testing of the 10G ports on the
X8, however enabling testing over the BigBangwidth Optical Switch setup by
Gary Finley.
Xnet SJF Report 2005 - Exhibit Performance
Both the Xnet displays in 919B and 2158 attracted reasonable attention. The
919B exhibit operated continuously for the entire period alternately manned
by Loki Jorgenson, Bill Rutherford, Thomas Tam(short duration) and Randy Ottman.
The 2158 Xnet exhibit ran from 1:30 to 4:30 on Tuesday and from 2:30 to 5:30
on Wednesday and was manned by Bill Rutherford. Randy Ottman manned 919B on
Thursday from 10:00 to 4:00. The location of the Xnet SJF booth was ideal
as a relatively continuous stream of interested parties were engaged. Gary
Finley fielded questions at 2158 when the Xnet demo was not running.
Xnet SJF Report 2005 - Committee Recommendations
Overall the process of setting up the exhibits was handled in an exemplary
and professional manner. The unfortunate change in fibre type for the interbooth
runs was compounded by lack of available adapters and somewhat unexpected
difficulties with the fibre and 10G NICs. Considerable extra time was spent
by Lixin, Martin and Loki troubleshooting the 10G NICs. We made a valiant
effort to adapt and partially succeeded. Clearly it might be wise to double
check the fibre type in future.
Xnet SJF Report 2005 - Research Follow-up
It is our intention to complete the 16k testing initiated at SC 05 (preliminarily
at SFU at 1G) and extend it to the wide area. There is an interesting observed
behavior at 12K exhibited by the 1G Intel cards that we are investigating.
As well, we wish to move to an environment where super-jumbo is more relevant
- non-LAN latencies (> 10 ms). Some discussion wrt a 64k path of significant
round trip time to provide the critical validation of the ability of larger
packet size to compensate for reduced throughput indicated that the limiting
factor of NLR to support such a test may be the 15808 MTU of 10,000 bytes.
As such it is an open question as to how best to proceed with a 64k test over
a large latency. Clearly the potential availability of 2 ER16 routers, possibly
with both 1G and 10G interfaces at some considerable distance linked by a
non blocking 64k circuit would be ideal. This of course assumes the availability
of 64k NICs at some point in the future.
The Xnet SJF project team would like to acknowledge the generous participation
and supporting infrastructure from Enterasys, Spirent, BCNET, CANARIE, CA*net4, HEPnet Canada,
IRMACS, Netera, Simon Fraser University, WestGrid, University of Alberta Subatomic
Physics and University of Victoria Physics.